Deliberation, Grand jury, Hung jury 1031 Words 3 Pages Democracy and the right to serve as a juror are a great privilege and responsibility which is not to be taken lightly, as see n in Twelve Angry Men. A group can be defined as two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who come together to achieve a particular objective. In the Broadway play and 1997 film a fan, in the 1957 film, a fan. It is necessary that all jurors vote unanimously for a verdict to be reached, and when juror 8 votes non-guilty, he forces all jurors to discuss the case. Nine: It's only one night. He was convinced that the evidence was concrete enough to convict the boy. Juror Nine suggests that the old man may have convinced himself that he heard the words because he has never had any recognition from anyone and has a strong need for attention.
In this episode, the jury is presiding over the case of a man accused of stabbing another man attempting to make a bank deposit. Forming define as members get acquainted and organized to select a leader, a given example for the forming stage in this movie is the twelve men were up for the first vote, engaged in social oriented behavior to become acquainted with one another. Static Characters Dynamic Characters Some of the dynamic characters are jurors 1,4,5,7,8,9,10, and 11. The entire play takes place in the jury room of a New York City court of law in 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. It formed a perfect conflict that led group members device by two sub-group, vote guilty group and vote not guilty group, seat back for digging deep into the provided evidences to make sure if they. With the evidence making the boy appear guilty, a single juror questions the accuracy of. What's the point of having witnesses at all? There are several gasps and everyone stares at the knife.
Writing in a female might change the group dynamic and require extra work in script writing …. I think maybe we owe him a few words. It was pronounced that the boy had stabbed his father with a switch knife in an apartment area near L-tracks. When the votes are counted, there are ten guilty votes and one not guilty. Don't be turned off by the black and white - is considered a classic.
The second that the biggest piece of evidence is put into doubt, he changes his vote. If he didn't, who did? After a lengthy trial they are finally able to. You could draw a diagram of your own and label each seat with character traits and numbers and use that to help you memorize them. My boss does all the supposin', but I'll try one. But, not in Capital cases! When Juror Number Five and Juror Number Ten get upset with one another, the foreman calms them down by saying, 'There's nothing personal. Group Influence There is no doubt that people are often susceptible to conformity.
The proceedings that followed were longer, and more taxing than they expected but the longer they talked about it, the more clear the picture became. Despite its invigorating content, the movie made very little money and was virtually unknown to the vast public for decades. Abuse, Bias, Jury 1375 Words 4 Pages The 1957 film Twelve Angry Men serves as an excellent example demonstrating sources of power and influence tactics in leadership. Oh gosh, it's been years since I've seen the movie didn't read the play. Juror Three reviews what they know. I mean, where does he come off calling me a public avenger, sadist and everything? Identify some errors in his thinking.
It's a gripping tale populated with distinct and memorable characters who, unfortunately, have no names, only their jury numbers. The issues that will be brought up in this essay are leadership, participation, climate, conflict, and argumentation. We don't owe the kid a thing. Even if the top of his head is bald, he still has some hair on his sides and back of his head. In this episode, Rob Petrie is the only juror who believes the defendant to be innocent. In the end, they conclude not that hes necessarily innocent, but that they have reasonable doubt hes guilty.
The defendant has a criminal record and a lot of circumstantial evidence piled up against him. Antagonist, Ethics, Hung jury 1746 Words 6 Pages. A reader may think that this somehow takes away from the characters' personalities or the audience's ability to relate to them. Some differences between the play and the movie are that in the movie, there is a scene in the very beginning in the courtroom, and in the middle, a scene in the bathroom. While there was factual evidence presented, juror 8 persuaded all the.
Lesson Summary The foreman of the jury is the lead juror who is in charge of making sure everyone gets an opportunity to speak and that the jurors are being productive while in the jury room. At the beginning, eleven of the twelve jurors voted guilty. Not only is this the way it's meant to be seen, but it will help you visualize the characters. We learn that he is an architect, by trade. There are pencils pads and an. Round Characters Some round characters are all the jurors except jurors 2, 3, 6, and 12. Jury 9 Jury number 9 was the old man seated next to Henry Fonda at the table.
We are led to believe that this is a contributing factor to his prejudice against the defendant, accused of stabbing his own father. Played By: John Savoca A boy who has been accused of murdering his father. Because we knock 'em on the head once a day, every day. I'm just saying it's possible. Eight: You want to see this boy die because you personally want it—not because of the facts. Decision making, Decision making software, Decision theory 972 Words 3 Pages 12 Angry Men: Reaction Paper The film 12 Angry Men gives an inside look at the inner workings of a jury deliberation as twelve random strangers are called to do their civil duty.
Setting: The play takes place in a hot, stuffy jury room there is no air-conditioning in New York during the 1950s. The slum is a breeding ground for criminals. Each Act takes happens in the same place. The Foreman also facilitates the initial voting and discussion on the reasons why each jury member felt that way. Antagonist Character Role Analysis Juror 3 You might think that Juror 10 should be the antagonist of this movie, since he's a total racist who has no interest in justice or morals. Juror Four still insists that the boy is guilty.